[ad_1]
In this video, the author expresses his dissatisfaction with the latest episode of AEW Dynamite, which he describes as “very bad”. He harshly criticized Tony Khan, the promotion’s booker, saying that AEW could never improve while Khan was in charge. According to him, the decline of the promotion is tangible, although bankruptcy is not yet imminent. The author highlights major problems in story management and match structure, notably the excessive reliance on long fights without narrative stakes. He also laments Khan’s ability to tell coherent and engaging stories, using real-life examples of storylines that have not evolved and seem incoherent. In short, he says AEW’s situation is dire and that improvement is unlikely as long as Khan remains at the helm of the company.
In the world of wrestling, the struggle to attract and retain an audience is incessant. With the emergence of AEW came high expectations. However, some critics believe the company is on a slippery slope. Let’s take a closer look at the current status of the program AEW Dynamite and the problems which seem to multiply.
A declining level of quality
Every week, spectators expect exciting matches, but massive criticism goes back to the trend of matches longs 20 to 25 minutes. Unfortunately, this leads to predictability: in most of these matchups, the outcome seems already known, especially when it comes to wrestlers of different skill levels. With the exception of bouts between top wrestlers, these long battles become monotonous and turn off fans.
Furthermore, the sequence of spectacular fights cannot compensate for weak script handling. The plots must evolve and surprise. For example, the story surrounding the character of John Moxley seems fixed, tirelessly repeating the same elements without offering new revelations.
Belts and tournaments with no real meaning
The recent Continental Classicwhich aims to be an imitation of famous tournaments like the G1, also raises questions. With no real stakes at stake, fans are wondering why they should get involved in these fights. The example of the previous edition, where the titles were divided shortly after their unification, illustrates an inconsistent management of the titles which devalues their importance.
The popularity of titles seems to be plummeting, and when rules regarding interference are established, inconsistencies appear. Struggles of this type seem to contradict others where interference is commonplace. Such an approach creates irritation rather than enthusiasm.
Questionable creative direction
Another question that arises concerns the general direction of creativity. The stories surrounding wrestlers follow one another without any real logic, making any emotional connection difficult. For example, the famous feud between Adam Cole and MJF was poorly handled, with twists and turns that left fans confused about the characters’ motivations. This lack of coherence in the narrative arcs calls into question the competence of Tony Khan as a booker.
Recent events, such as the involvement of Roderick Strong et Kyle O’Reillyappear disconnected from previous stories, further confusing fans. Therefore, the inability to build compelling long-term stories compromises the interest and excitement around the wrestlers.
An uncertain future for AEW
While AEW has the enormous potential to innovate and redefine American wrestling, criticism over the quality of its content is becoming more and more frequent. The criticism may seem excessive, but it reflects a discomfort shared by many fans. Continuing on this path, it is difficult to imagine significant improvement as long as the current direction persists.
In conclusion, the issues discussed highlight the challenges that AEW absolutely must face to remain competitive in the world of wrestling. Audiences expect engaging storylines and exciting wrestling, and if AEW wants to reclaim its title as the new alternative to wrestling, significant changes are necessary.